|
|
Knowledge and Information Systems |
Paper Number:
Paper Title:
Author(s):
Name of Editorial Board Member:
Name of Reviewer (if different from EB member):
Date Sent:
Date to be Returned (preferably by e-mail):
RATINGS OF PAPER
[Please rate the following by entering a score between -3 to 3
with 0 being the average based on the following guidelines:
| 3: | Strong Accept (As good as any top paper in reputable journals) |
| 2: | Accept (Comparable to good papers in reputable journals) |
| 1: | Weak Accept (I vote acceptance, but won't argue for it) |
| 0: | Neutral (I don't like it, but I won't object if others like it) |
| -1: | Weak Reject (I would rather not see this paper accepted) |
| -2: | Reject (I would argue to reject this paper) |
| -3: | Strong Reject (Definitely detrimental to the journal quality if accepted)] |
Originality of the paper:
Technical soundness:
Significance:
Clarity of presentation:
Relevance to KAIS:
- Is the paper topic on the KAIS topic list? ( ) yes ( ) no
- Does the paper cite several KAIS papers? ( ) yes ( ) no
- Does it relate to other KAIS papers you may have read?
( ) yes ( ) no
LENGTH (relative to the useful contents of the paper)
About right:
Should be shortened:
Should be extended:
If the paper should be shortened, please indicate an expected number
of pages (in its submission format) to be removed:
OVERALL RECOMMENDATION
Accept with no changes:
Accept subject to minor revisions:
Author should prepare a major revision for a second review:
(Not applicable if the paper in question is itself a major
revision of a previously reviewed paper.)
Reject:
If the paper is accepted, it should be published as a
regular paper:
short paper:
A SHORT SUMMARY OF THE RATIONALE FOR YOUR RECOMMENDATION
(5 lines expected)
DETAILED COMMENTS FOR AUTHOR(S)
CONFIDENTIAL COMMENTS TO THE EDITORIAL BOARD